METHODS OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
An economic
theory derives laws or generalizations through two methods (1) Deductive Method
and (2) Inductive Method. These two ways of deriving economic generalizations
are now explained in brief.
1.
Deductive Method.
The deductive
method is also named as analytical, abstract or prior method. The deductive
method consists in deriving conclusions from general truths. It takes a few
general principles and applies them to draw conclusions. For instance, if we
accept the general proposition Law of diminishing marginal utility Rashid is a
man. Therefore, the inference will be drawn that Rashid is motivated by
self-interest. In applying the deductive method of economic analysis, we
proceed from general to particular.
The classical and neo-classical
school of economists notably Ricardo. Senior, Cairnes, J.S. Mill, Malthus,
Marshall, Pigou, applied the deductive method in their economic investigations.
The main steps involved in deductive logic are
as under_
(1) Perception of the problem to be inquired into. In the
process of deriving economic generalizations, the analyst must have a clear and
precise idea of the problem to be inquired into.
(2) Defining of terms.
The next step in this direction is to define clearly the technical terms to be
used in economic analysis. Further, the assumptions made for a theory should
also be precise.
(3) Deducing hypothesis
from the assumptions. The third step in deriving generalizations is deducing
hypothesis from the assumptions taken.
(4) Testing of
hypothesis. Before establishing laws or generalizations, the hypothesis should
be verified through direct observations of events in the real world and through
statistical methods. (There is an inverse relationship between price and
.quantity demanded of a good is a well-established generalization).
Merits of Deductive Method
The main
merits of deductive method are as under:
(1) This
method is near to reality. It is less time consuming and
less expensive.
(2) The
use of mathematical techniques in deducing theories
of economics brings
exactness and clarity in economic
analysis.
(3) There being limited
scope of experimentation in economics,
the method helps in deriving economic
theories.
(4) The method is simple
because it is analytical, Demerits of
deductive method. It is true that
deductive method is simple and precise, if the underlying assumptions are
valid. There is big, IF, in the statement. The shortcomings of the deductive
approach are as under:
(1) The
deductive method is simple and precise only if the underlying assumptions are
valid. More often the assumptions turn out to be based on half truths or have
no relation to reality. The conclusions drawn from such assumptions will, therefore,
be misleading.
(2) Professor
Learner describes the deductive method as ‘armchair’ analysis. According to
him, the premises from which inferences are drawn may not hold good at all
times, and places. As such deductive reasonings are not applicable universally.
(3) The
deductive method is highly abstract. It require § a great deal of care to avoid
bad, logic or faulty economic reasoning. As the deductive method employed by
the classical and neo-classical economists led to many facile conclusions due
to reliance on imperfect and incorrect assumptions, therefore, under the German
Historical School of economists, a sharp reaction began against this method.
They advocated a more realistic method for economic analysis known as inductive
method.
2. Inductive Method
Inductive
method which is also called empirical method was adopted by the istorical
“School of economists. It involves-the process of reasoning from articular
facts to general principle. This method derives economic generalizations n the
basis of (1) Experimentations (2) Observations and (3) Statistical ‘methods.
Systematically
arranged and the general conclusions are drawn from them. For example, we
observe 200 persons in the market. We find that nearly 195 persons buy from the
cheapest shops, Out of the 5 which remains, 4 persons buy local products even
at higher rate just to patronise their own products, while the fifth is a fool.
From this observation, we can easily draw conclusions that people like to buy
from a cheaper shop unless they are guided by patriotism or they are devoid of common
sense.
The main steps involved in the
application of inductive method are: (i) observation (ii) formation of
hypothesis (iii) generalization and (iv) verification. Merits of inductive
method.
(1) It
is based on facts as such the method is realistic.
(2) In order to test the economic principles, the method makes
use of statistical techniques. The inductive method is, therefore,
more-reliable.
(3) Inductive method is
dynamic. The changing economic
phenomenon are analysed and on the basis of
collected
data, conclusions and solutions are drawn from them.
(4) Induction method also helps in future investigations.
Demerits of inductive method.
The main weaknesses of this method are as under.‑
(1) If conclusions are drawn from insufficient data, the
generalizations obtained may befaulty.
(2) The collection of
data itself is not an easy task.
The sources and methods employed In the
collection of data differ from investigator to investigator.
The results,
therefore,may differ
even with the same problem.
(3) The inductive method is time-consuming and expensive.
Conclusion
The above
analysis reveals that both the methods have weaknesses. We cannot rely
exclusively on any one of them. Modern economists are of the view that both
these methods are complimentary. They are partners and not rivals. ‘Alfred
Marshall has rightly remarked, “Inductive and Deductive methods are both needed
for scientific thought, ag the right and left foot are both needed for
walking”. We can apply any of them or both as the situation demands.
No comments:
Post a Comment